Lots of people are talking about how Michelle and Barack Obama look identical in all the pictures they take which obviously means they are zombies.
Despite the fact our President and First Lady are the living dead, the real story is how funny the other world leaders look in comparison.
Most of these people if you saw them in Walmart wearing the exact clothing they have on in the picture, you wouldn’t think twice about asking them where the bonus packs of toilet paper are.
Hysterical Picture #1
I have no idea who this World leader above is, but I have a sneaking suspicion it’s ‘Pedro’ from Napoleon Dynomite. Tell me I’m wrong? Go ahead! Tell me. Right, you can’t. Congratulations Pedro on becoming a World leader.
Anthony Lewis from Harlem stops to speak with Associated Press correspondent Ted Shaffrey about Obama and proceeds to get rooted by his friend. Listen at the :33 second mark when Lewis starts talking his friend chimes in a couple seconds later.
Let’s go…you ain’t smart!
HAH! Lewis should have kicked his friend in the balls because you know the cameraman would have followed that.
Pictured above is Rev. Jay Scott Newman of St. Mary’s Catholic Church in Greenville, SC and he has a message for his Parishioners.
Our nation has chosen for its chief executive the most radical pro-abortion politician ever to serve in the United States Senate or to run for president…Voting for a pro-abortion politician when a plausible pro-life alternative exits constitutes material cooperation with intrinsic evil, and those Catholics who do so place themselves outside of the full communion of Christ’s Church and under the judgment of divine law. Persons in this condition should not receive Holy Communion until and unless they are reconciled to God in the Sacrament of Penance, lest they eat and drink their own condemnation.
Apparently Rev. Newman has little regard for separation of Church and State, but even less regard for Democracy. I spent some time on Rev. Newman’s personal page and read a thought provoking editorial titled A Gender Gap in the Church? in which the Reverend articulately debates both sides of the position on allowing female priests in the Catholic Church, but his position on President-Elect Obama crosses the line.
Rev. Newman sets a very dangerous precedent for all Catholics who if faced with the choice of two candidates who are both pro-life then who would the faithful vote for, or if at all? With over 69,000,000, or 23% of the entire US population professing to be Catholic the affect of a massive write in, or no vote campaign would be historic and damaging to our Democracy should the faithful be deterred from breaking ranks with the Church on a candidate.
There are more reasons people consider other than abortion rights when selecting a candidate for President and to disregard these factors which weigh on people when deciding whom to vote is to thumb your nose at their existence outside the church. By insinuating you are not a ‘good’ Catholic because you voted for a candidate whose views differ than the Church is manipulative, fear inducing and guilt baiting which is exactly the reason I know longer consider myself a Catholic.
If the Catholic Church wants more young people to attend service and embrace their religious ideology the Church needs to provide thought provoking information instead of trying to scare them into it.
Exploiters of the Second Amendment are afraid of President-Elect Obama and Joe Biden, so these gun advocates nutbags are stocking up on high powered weapons like milk and bread before a blizzard. Steve Sechler a gun dealer in the Phoenix area echoed the concerns of his customers and Sechler stated demand at a gun show jumped 50% since the election.
Most of the people there were cussing Obama and saying we need home defense
I understand the argument of second amendment proponents that an armed civilian society is a deterrent to a government which would otherwise seek to repress its people, but is it really unreasonable to restrict the sale of firearms which only the military has a valid excuse to own? It is complete bullshit for anyone in this country to argue the second amendment provides them the right to own a weapon capable of mowing down a village.
Obama has stated repeatedly he is not going to restrict gun ownership, or the right to purchase certain weapons, but advocateszealots aren’t buying what Obama is saying and the National Rifle Association is gearing up for a fight. This predicted fight between Obama and the NRA is strictly about profits and not about protecting our rights as Americans. There is no way you would ever convince me owning an AR-15 is for protection unless of course you are being hunted by wolverines, rabid honey badgers, sharks with legs, tigers with light sabers, hippos with knives and old ladies with machine guns.
Personally I think a handgun, or a hunting rifle is more than adequate to ‘protect’ yourself and keep the second amendment intact. The Founding Fathers of this country never in a million years would have included AR-15’s (pictured above with the flag), or Kalashnikov rifles as a right of all ‘people’ to own. Be a real man and buy the most bad ass handgun known to the world and protect yourself with that.
